Technology card
End of lifeMagnetic Drum and Core Memory (pre-RAMAC storage)
drum memory · magnetic drum · drum store · magnetic core memory · core store · ferrite core memory · pre-RAMAC storage
The drum is the direct ancestor of the rotating-disk drive in layout and recording method, but not of RAMAC's capacity: the ERA 1101 drum of 1950 and the RAMAC disk stack of 1956 recorded at similar surface densities (about 1,280 and up to about 2,000 bits per square inch), so RAMAC's gain came from stacking 100 recording surfaces behind a moving access arm.
Glossary entry on hesela.dev · JSON record
Related
In one minute
Before the IBM RAMAC disk drive of 1956, computers kept programs and data on magnetic drums (a rotating cylinder with a fixed head for each track, first built in the mid-1940s and delivered in a production computer in 1950) and, from 1953, in magnetic core memory (a grid of ferrite rings giving random access to every bit), and the two technologies split a job that disk drives later took over in part.
Between 1946 and 1956 computer storage was built from two magnetic ideas that were not disks: the drum, a rotating cylinder with one fixed read/write head for each track, and the core, a ring of ferrite switched by currents in crossing wires. The Computer History Museum dates the first working drum stores to 1946 (Booth, London) and 1947 (ERA, Minnesota), the first delivery of a drum computer to 1950, and the first demonstration of core memory to August 1953. IBM's RAMAC of September 1956, usually treated as the first disk drive, still contained a drum and a core register in its processing unit, so the disk stack took over bulk storage rather than replacing every earlier memory.
1932 and the patent record. The Museum says Gustav Tauschek (1899-1945), working at an IBM punched-card subsidiary in Sommerda, Germany, demonstrated and patented a prototype magnetic drum in 1932, with fixed heads on a ferromagnetic-coated cylinder holding 500,000 bits, and cites German patent DE 643,803 (filed 1 July 1933, issued 17 April 1937). This card opened one Tauschek patent, US 2,080,100, a continuation in part of an application of 4 August 1932. It describes magnetising points on groups of steel strips to hold account balances, selected by a dial and read back into number wheels. It does not describe a rotating drum or a 500,000-bit capacity. The drum attribution therefore rests on the German patent, which was not opened here; the US patent is evidence only that Tauschek was recording numbers magnetically in 1932-1933.
1946-1948: Booth in London. The Science Museum Group holds an experimental drum store that it dates to about 1946 in London, devised by Andrew Donald Booth as a memory device. Booth's own autobiography, reproduced by the IEEE Computer Society, says the drum was a 2 inch diameter brass cylinder plated with 0.0005 inch of nickel, with 21 parallel channels plus a clock channel, storing 256 words of 21 bits for his Automatic Relay Computer, which was demonstrated on 12 May 1948. The Museum and the IEEE page give the drum as 2 inches in diameter and 2 inches long at 10 bits per inch. Booth also reports that his first attempt, a spinning 10 inch recording disc with a head held at a fixed distance by the Bernoulli effect, failed because the disc flapped, and that a small firm run by his father made drums, largely for export to the US. He says T. Kilburn of Manchester visited on 2 November 1948 and took away a sample of his read/write heads, which he later found had been copied by the Manchester group and by Ferranti. Those statements are Booth's recollection and no second source was found for them.
1947-1950: ERA in Minnesota built a different kind of drum. The Museum says William Norris led a group at Engineering Research Associates (including John Hill and Robert Perkins) that cemented 3M ferric-oxide-coated Mylar tape onto a cast aluminium cylinder for a US Navy cryptographic unit in 1947. In 1950 ERA produced an 8.5 inch drum with 200 stationary heads and 16,384 words of 24 bits for the Atlas 1 code-breaking computer, which became the Univac 1101 after Remington Rand bought ERA. The company's 1951 brochure (vendor claim) says the first 1101 was delivered to the US Government in 1950 and ran eight days later, that marks are stored at 1,280 per square inch in parallel peripheral tracks with one head per track, that a revolution takes about 17 milliseconds, and that access time is 32 microseconds to 17 milliseconds. The VIP Club, a veterans' group, says Arnold Cohen and Sidney Rubens are credited with patenting the rotating drum and that a prototype description was presented as a paper in 1947. It also claims the ERA drum was the world's first computer hard drive; this card does not adopt that claim.
Drums become the memory of the early 1950s. The Museum lists the Harvard Mark III (1949), Manchester Mark I (1949), SWAC (1950) and MIT Whirlwind (1951) among early machines with drum memory, and the Univac 1101 (1951), IBM 650 (1953) and English Electric DEUCE (1955) among commercial ones. The VIP Club quotes a 14 October 1952 ERA newsletter saying MIT staff were running acceptance tests on ERA magnetic storage systems for Whirlwind; that is a year later than the Museum's 1951 date and may describe a later unit, and the card does not reconcile them. IBM says it announced the 650 on 14 July 1953. Its drum held 20,000 digits in the first version and up to 40,000 later, in 20 or 40 bands of 50 words, spun at 12,500 rpm, and gave an average access of 2.4 milliseconds. IBM also says the first 650 was delivered in December 1954, nearly 2,000 were installed, and production ended in 1962 (vendor history).
Core memory. The Museum says Frederick Viehe filed a core patent in 1947 and An Wang in 1949, with RCA's Jan Rajchman filing in 1950 and MIT's Jay Forrester in 1951, and that other important contributors include E. Albers-Schonberg, J. P. Eckert and M. K. Haynes. Forrester's patent 2,736,880, Multicoordinate Digital Information Storage Device, was filed in May 1951 and granted on 28 February 1956 (Museum; Centre for Computing History). The Whirlwind project, a US Navy real-time flight simulator, replaced a troubled electrostatic CRT memory with a 32 by 32 array of 1,024 cores and demonstrated it in August 1953 (Museum). The MIT course page adds that IBM then licensed the technology, that Ken Olson, later founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, was the liaison between MIT and IBM, and that a lawsuit over the patent rights produced an unusually complete archive. The Museum says IBM announced its first commercial core unit, the Model 737 with 4,096 words of 36 bits, in 1954, and that cost fell from about 1.00 dollar to one cent per bit before semiconductor memory replaced cores in the 1970s.
What this meant for disk drives. Once cores held the working data, drums and then disks took the role of bulk storage. IBM's archive page describes the 305 RAMAC processing unit as containing a magnetic process drum and a magnetic core register, with the 350 disk storage unit attached: 50 disks, 50,000 sectors of 100 characters each (5 million characters), 1,200 rpm, 20 tracks per inch recorded at up to 100 bits per inch, typical head-to-disk spacing of 800 microinches and an average seek of about 600 milliseconds, with the first model announced on 4 September 1956. A Computer History Museum profile by A. S. Hoagland says the RAMAC lab's insight was to use a stack of disks instead of the magnetic drums then in use, because a disk stack offers far more recording surface for its volume, and that the air-bearing head, spin-coated iron-oxide disks and the moving access arm were new. IBM's own history says the team tried rods, strips, tapes and flat plates before settling on aluminium disks coated with iron oxide paint, and quotes Reynold Johnson as saying the goal was half a second to reach any track and that about 800 milliseconds was achieved. The Museum says drums persisted in specialised uses into the 1980s, and the VIP Club says Univac's Fastrand drums were a mainstay of mass storage in the 1960s and 1970s.
What the sources do not settle. No source opened here gives a production count for magnetic drums across all makers, and the card does not state one. The 1932 drum claim is unverified beyond the Museum's statement. Booth's account of the copying of his heads is a single recollection, and the ERA veterans' claim to the first computer hard drive comes from an interested party.
Compared to neighbors
A drum is not a disk drive. A drum has one fixed head per track and no positioning mechanism, so its capacity is limited by head count, and its average access time is half a revolution. RAMAC replaced the fixed heads with an access arm that moved between disk surfaces. Core memory is also not storage in the later sense: it was the working memory of the computer, in the role now played by DRAM, not the role of a disk.
| Device | Year | Storage medium and geometry | Capacity | Access time | Source and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tauschek magnetic memory (US 2,080,100) | 1932-1933 filings | Steel strips magnetised at up to ten points per strip, selected by a dial; not a drum | 100 account records in the machine described | Not stated | US patent text; the Museum separately credits a 500,000 bit drum in German patent DE 643,803, not opened |
| Booth drum (Birkbeck, London) | c. 1946-1948 | Nickel-plated brass cylinder, 2 inch diameter, 2 inch long, 21 channels plus clock, 10 bits per inch | 256 words of 21 bits (5,376 bits, derived) | Response time 0.002 s (IEEE Computer Society) | Science Museum Group; IEEE Computer Society page and Booth autobiography |
| ERA 1101 / Atlas I drum | 1950 (first delivery) | 8.5 inch drum, 200 fixed heads, marks at 1,280 per square inch | 16,384 words of 24 bits (393,216 bits, derived) | 32 microseconds minimum, 17 milliseconds maximum; revolution about 17 ms | Museum; ERA brochure (vendor claim) |
| IBM 650 drum | Announced 1953 | 20 or 40 bands of 50 words, 12,500 rpm | 20,000 to 40,000 digits (7 bits per digit, so 140,000 to 280,000 bits, derived) | Average 2.4 milliseconds | IBM history page (vendor claim) |
| Whirlwind core array | August 1953 | 32 by 32 ferrite cores | 1,024 bits | Not stated in the sources opened | Museum |
| IBM Model 737 core unit | Announced 1954 | Ferrite cores | 4,096 words of 36 bits (147,456 bits, derived) | Not stated in the sources opened | Museum |
| IBM 350 disk storage (RAMAC) | Announced 4 September 1956 | 50 disks of two feet diameter, 1,200 rpm, 20 tracks per inch at up to 100 bits per inch, 800 microinch head spacing | 5,000,000 characters (50,000 sectors of 100 characters) | Average seek about 600 ms; maximum 0.8 s | IBM Archives; Hoagland (Museum profile); IBM's history page quotes about 800 ms |
Uncertainty notes
- The ERA 1101 figures (1,280 marks per square inch, 17 ms revolution, 32 microsecond to 17 ms access, delivery in 1950 and operation after eight days) come from the maker's 1951 brochure and are vendor claims. The Museum independently gives the 1950 delivery, 8.5 inch diameter, 200 heads and 16,384 words of 24 bits.
- The statement that RAMAC's recording density (20 tracks per inch times up to 100 bits per inch, which is up to 2,000 bits per square inch, derived) was within a factor of two of the ERA 1101 drum (1,280 marks per square inch) is this card's arithmetic on two sources and compares a vendor brochure with an IBM archive page.
- The Museum gives 1946 for Booth's drum and the Science Museum Group gives circa 1946; Booth's autobiography places the demonstrated machine on 12 May 1948. The Museum and the IEEE page both give 2 inches by 2 inches and 10 bits per inch.
- The 1932 Tauschek magnetic drum rests on the Museum page and German patent DE 643,803; the US patent that this card opened describes a strip-based accounting store, not a drum.
- The Museum dates Whirlwind's drum to 1951 while an ERA newsletter quoted by the VIP Club dates acceptance tests of ERA storage for Whirlwind to October 1952.
- The IBM 650 average access of 2.4 milliseconds is IBM's figure. At 12,500 rpm a revolution takes 4.8 milliseconds, so half a revolution is 2.4 milliseconds (this card's arithmetic, consistent with IBM's figure).
- RAMAC seek times differ by source: IBM Archives says about 600 milliseconds on average, Hoagland says a 0.8 second maximum, and IBM's history page quotes Reynold Johnson's recollection of about 800 milliseconds against a half-second goal.
- Core cost falling from 1.00 dollar to one cent per bit is a Museum summary without a year-by-year source; the card quotes it as stated.
- The VIP Club page is a veterans' site and an interested party for ERA and Univac claims; its statements are labelled as its own or used only where the Museum or the ERA brochure agrees.
Sources
- 01Computer History Museum - 1932: Tauschek patents magnetic drum storage (The Storage Engine), file rev. 11.27.15 · accessed 2026-10-10
- 02G. Tauschek - US patent 2,080,100, Method and means for storing and selecting records (continuation in part of an application of 4 August 1932; published 11 May 1937), via freepatentsonline.com · accessed 2026-10-10
- 03IEEE Computer Society - Computer Pioneers: Andrew Donald Booth (includes Booth's own autobiography) · accessed 2026-10-10
- 04Science Museum Group Collection - Experimental magnetic drum store, object 1959-180, made circa 1946 in London · accessed 2026-10-10
- 05Engineering Research Associates - Introducing the ERA 1101, brochure, 1951 (hosted by the Computer History Museum) · accessed 2026-10-10
- 06VIP Club (Univac/Sperry veterans, Minnesota) - Memory Engineering, Chapter 45: Drum Memories, Core, Thin Film · accessed 2026-10-10
- 07IBM - The IBM 650 (IBM history site) · accessed 2026-10-10
- 08Computer History Museum - 1953: Whirlwind computer debuts core memory (The Storage Engine), file rev. 11.5.15 · accessed 2026-10-10
- 09The Centre for Computing History - Jay Forrester patents magnetic-core memory, 28 February 1956 · accessed 2026-10-10
- 10MIT course 6.933 - Project History: Magnetic Core Memory (Wayback Machine capture of 14 July 2023) · accessed 2026-10-10
- 11IBM Archives - IBM 350 disk storage unit (Wayback Machine capture of 31 May 2008) · accessed 2026-10-10
- 12A. S. Hoagland - IBM 350 RAMAC, Computer History Museum group profile, 1 March 2013 · accessed 2026-10-10
- 13IBM - RAMAC (IBM history site) · accessed 2026-10-10