Skip to content

Technology card

Unknown

Longitudinal Recording

LMR

Longitudinal magnetization lies along a track. A calculated cubic-grain size of about 9.7 nm, a 1998 design size of about 12 ± 4 nm, and a later modal size of about 9 nm are different figures.

On this page6 sections

In one minute

Longitudinal magnetic recording stores HDD data with magnetization in the plane of the recording surface along the track direction.

Longitudinal magnetization lies along a track, while PMR magnetization points normal to the surface. The change involves different head and medium geometry, not simply a new software command. [pmr-hgst-2007]

This is an orientation category, not the opposite of CMR. Non-shingled versus shingled describes track overlap. Historical use of the word conventional for longitudinal recording must not be read as the modern CMR/SMR taxonomy. [pmr-hgst-2007] [toshiba-pmr-announcement] [zoned-smr]

A December 2004 PMR product announcement scheduled production for 2005; a November 2007 technical paper describes another company's PMR introduction in 2006. These milestones describe adoption of the successor technology, not a single worldwide end date for longitudinal HDDs. [toshiba-pmr-announcement] [pmr-hgst-2007]

The medium is a layer of weakly coupled CoCr-alloy grains, with chromium segregated to the grain boundaries and several hundred grains per bit cell for low noise. Smaller grains keep the signal-to-noise ratio as density rises but can reverse thermally, so KuV must exceed about 55 kBT to hold a signal for five years at about 340 K. [fu2006] Modal grain size fell from about 20 nm to about 9 nm in a decade, a volume ratio of about 0.09. [plumer2011]

A February 2005 technical report identifies demagnetizing fields and thermal instability as constraints on increasing longitudinal density. It explains a PMR head/media response, not a measured industry-wide investment shift or a universal date at which longitudinal recording stopped improving. [tanaka-2005]

About 9.7 nm is calculated for a cubic Co-alloy grain at 300K only if Ku is 2.5 x 10^6 erg/cc and KuV/kBT is at least 60 for 10 years. The 1998 10Gbits/in^2 design cited beside that calculation used grains of about 12 ± 4 nm, so 9.7 nm is not that design's grain size and is not a measured modal size. [lu2001]

A 2011 review estimates that KuV/kBT should be greater than about 60 at operating HDD temperatures of about 340 K for recorded transitions. That estimate is not a five-year rule of larger than 55 kBT and not a numeric areal-density ceiling. The same review says that prior to 2006-7 all HDDs used longitudinal media and that the longitudinal mode prevailed until 2005. Those are the review's dates, not a worldwide last shipment. Its modal sizes, from about 20 nm to about 9 nm, are for the past decade relative to the review. Ni/Fe Permalloy with a saturation magnetization of 1.0 T was replaced by Co/Ni/Fe alloys with 1.3-2.1 T and finally by CoFe having 2.4 T in the late 1990's. Fig. 2 shows simulated transitions at 788.8 kfci. [plumer2011]

Each bit must cover about 100 grains so the information is reliably stored, and below a grain-size limit the magnetization may spontaneously reverse from thermal energy even at room temperature. Section 1.2 states no numeric areal-density ceiling. The paper says perpendicular recording was introduced in 2006 and that HGST's first perpendicular drive was the Travelstar 5K160. That 2006 introduction is not a worldwide last shipment of longitudinal drives. The title page says November 2007; the closing page prints a 2012 copyright and says the sample specifications do not constitute a warranty. [pmr-hgst-2007]

Toshiba's 14 December 2004 announcement prints an areal density of 206 megabits per square millimeter (133 gigabits per square inch) for the new 1.8-inch drives. It says the 40 GB platter is 33% more than its then-current 1.8-inch 30 GB MK3006GAL, and it calculates capacity with 1 GB equal to 1 billion bytes. Those figures belong to the announced perpendicular drives and the comparison with that model. They are not a longitudinal-media density and not a last-shipment date. [toshiba-pmr-announcement]

Iwasaki's 2009 review says Figure 11 shows that the paper described a flat response up to 100 kFRPI, even for the thickest medium when the gap loss was compensated, and that the maximum linear recording density of an IBM 3370 hard disk drive at the time was only 10 kFRPI. The 100 kFRPI figure is that described response. The 10 kFRPI figure is the 3370. [iwasaki-2009]

Compared to neighbors

Orientation is not track overlap, and a calculated grain size is not a design grain size. The transition card dates the switch. This card keeps the longitudinal grain, density, and linear-density figures in the records that printed them.

Longitudinal grain and density figures that must not be swapped
FigureWhat the cited record statesNot the same record
about 9.7 nmCalculated cubic Co-alloy grain at 300K only if Ku is 2.5 x 10^6 erg/cc and KuV/kBT is at least 60 for 10 years. [lu2001]The 1998 10Gbits/in^2 design's about 12 ± 4 nm, or a later measured modal size
about 20 nm to about 9 nmModal size over the past decade relative to the 2011 review. [plumer2011]The 9.7 nm cubic-grain calculation
greater than about 60KuV/kBT estimate at about 340 K for recorded transitions. [plumer2011]A five-year rule of larger than 55 kBT, or a numeric areal-density ceiling
about 100 grainsGrains per bit for reliable storage; a thermal lower bound even at room temperature. [pmr-hgst-2007]A numeric areal-density ceiling in section 1.2
100 kFRPI and 10 kFRPIA flat response up to 100 kFRPI for the thickest medium when gap loss was compensated, against an IBM 3370 maximum of 10 kFRPI. [iwasaki-2009]One linear density standing for both
206 Mb/mm^2 (133 Gb/in^2)Areal density of the 14 December 2004 1.8-inch drives; the 40 GB platter is 33% above the 30 GB MK3006GAL. [toshiba-pmr-announcement]A longitudinal-media density or a last-shipment date

Uncertainty notes

  • The volume ratio of about 0.09 is arithmetic, (9/20)^3, not a measured volume ratio.
  • The 9.7 nm figure is the section 2.2.1 calculation under the stated cubic-grain, Ku, KuV/kBT, 10-year, and 300K conditions. It is not the about 12 ± 4 nm size of the 1998 10Gbits/in^2 design cited in that paragraph.
  • KuV/kBT greater than about 60 at about 340 K is the 2011 estimate for recorded transitions. Larger than 55 kBT for at least five years at about 340 K is the separate 2006 criterion.
  • Section 1.2 states no numeric areal-density ceiling. The hosted file's title page says November 2007. Its closing page prints © 2012 and says the sample specifications do not constitute a warranty.

Sources

  1. 01HGST: Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Technology, November 2007, section 1.2 and closing page · accessed 2026-11-03
  2. 02Toshiba: Toshiba Leads Industry in Bringing Perpendicular Data Recording to HDD, 14 December 2004 · accessed 2026-11-03
  3. 03Western Digital: Shingled Magnetic Recording Hard Disks, SMR overview and interface implementations · accessed 2026-10-19
  4. 04Fu: Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of FePt/MgO Multilayered Thin Films, Vanderbilt University, December 2006 · accessed 2026-11-03
  5. 05Plumer, van Ek, and Cain: New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording, Physics in Canada 67(1), 2011 · accessed 2026-11-03
  6. 06Yoichiro Tanaka: Toshiba Review 60(2), February 2005, longitudinal scaling and PMR head/media design · accessed 2026-10-23
  7. 07Lu and Laughlin: Microstructure of Longitudinal Media, chapter 2 (2001), section 2.2.1 · accessed 2026-11-03
  8. 08Shun-ichi Iwasaki: Perpendicular magnetic recording, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 85 (2009) 37-54, p. 44 · accessed 2026-11-03

Published by Hesela team

Report a correction · Editorial standards · Reuse guidance

Cite this page
Hesela team. Longitudinal Recording. Hesela. https://hesela.com/tech/longitudinal-recording/